Member-only story

The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading: Current Arguments in Focus

John Parker

·3k Followers· Follow

Published in The Hidden Inequities In Labor Based Contract Grading (Current Arguments In Composition)

5 min read · 2 weeks before

264 View Claps

16 Respond

Save

Listen

Labor-based contract grading (LBCG) has emerged as a grading practice that aims to promote equity by focusing on student effort and engagement rather than solely on academic achievement. However, the implementation and implications of LBCG have sparked considerable debate, with some arguing its transformative potential while others highlight underlying inequities. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the current arguments surrounding LBCG, examining its potential for fostering equity and the challenges it faces in achieving this goal.

The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading (Current Arguments in Composition)

by Ellen C. Carillo

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	840 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	82 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

The Rationale for Labor-Based Contract Grading

Proponents of LBCG argue that traditional grading practices often perpetuate existing disparities and fail to account for the varying circumstances and learning experiences of students. By emphasizing effort over achievement, LBCG aims to create a more level playing field, allowing students to demonstrate their learning through participation, collaboration, and engagement. Additionally, it is believed to reduce the stress and anxiety associated with grades, fostering a more supportive and inclusive learning environment.

Equity and Inclusion in LBCG

One of the central goals of LBCG is to promote equity in grading practices. By decoupling grades from academic performance, LBCG allows students to earn credit for completing assignments, regardless of their academic ability. This approach is particularly beneficial for students who may struggle academically due to factors beyond their control, such as socioeconomic status, language barriers, or learning disabilities. LBCG provides these students with an opportunity to demonstrate their learning and earn grades that reflect their effort and engagement, rather than their academic achievement alone.

Challenges and Concerns

While LBCG has the potential to promote equity, it is not without its challenges. Critics argue that LBCG can lead to grade inflation, as students are guaranteed a certain level of credit regardless of the quality of their work. This can undermine the value of grades and make it difficult for instructors to assess student learning accurately. Additionally, some worry that LBCG may lead to a decrease in student motivation, as students may become less invested in producing high-quality work if they know they will receive credit simply for completing assignments.

Another concern with LBCG is that it may perpetuate inequities in assessment practices. Teachers' subjective interpretations of student effort and engagement can lead to biases, particularly for students from marginalized backgrounds. For example, students who are less vocal or outgoing may be perceived as less engaged, even if they are putting in significant effort. This can result in lower grades for these students, despite their efforts to meet the requirements of the contract.

Implications for Educational Policy

The debate surrounding LBCG has important implications for educational policy. As more educators and policymakers consider adopting LBCG, it is essential to carefully weigh its potential benefits and challenges. Policymakers need to ensure that LBCG is implemented in a way that truly promotes equity and does not lead to unintended consequences. This may involve providing clear guidelines and training for teachers, as well as creating accountability measures to prevent grade inflation and bias.

Labor-based contract grading is a complex and evolving grading practice that has the potential to both promote equity and perpetuate inequities. While it has shown promise in creating a more level playing field for students, it is important to address the challenges associated with LBCG to ensure its implementation is equitable and effective. As educators and policymakers continue to grapple with these issues, it is essential to engage in ongoing research and critical dialogue to ensure that grading practices truly support all students in reaching their full potential.

The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading (Current Arguments in Composition)

by Ellen C. Carillo

5 out of 5